Preface to “Stories of Geniuses” (Tentative Draft)

The idea for this book first arose when I was trans­lat­ing *Dear Genius: The Let­ters of Ursu­la Nord­strom*. After two and a half years, it was final­ly com­plet­ed through the col­lec­tive efforts of many. Using the char­ac­ters from *Dear Genius* as a thread, this book tells their life sto­ries one by one, in chrono­log­i­cal order of their birth dates. And when these sto­ries are strung togeth­er, a stun­ning pic­ture emerges: a vast cross-sec­tion of the Amer­i­can chil­dren’s book land­scape for about half a cen­tu­ry after the 1930s! Although incom­plete, it is enough to offer a glimpse into its essence.

A long scroll made of let­ters

“Dear Genius” is a col­lec­tion of let­ters from Ursu­la, a bril­liant edi­tor in the Amer­i­can chil­dren’s book indus­try, to her authors, illus­tra­tors, crit­ics, and read­ers. It com­pris­es near­ly 300 let­ters select­ed from over 100,000 let­ters writ­ten dur­ing her near­ly half-cen­tu­ry-long career. Many of the authors and illus­tra­tors are renowned fig­ures in the Amer­i­can (and even inter­na­tion­al) chil­dren’s book world, many of whom are grad­u­al­ly becom­ing famil­iar to Chi­nese read­ers and have count­less fans in Chi­na. Many of the works dis­cussed in those let­ters have grad­u­al­ly become clas­sics of world chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture. Read­ers who love chil­dren and chil­dren’s books often yearn to under­stand the sto­ries behind these won­der­ful books, while chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture enthu­si­asts and researchers hope to clar­i­fy the con­text by under­stand­ing the cre­ators and their back­grounds. Ursu­la’s col­lec­tion of let­ters is indeed a rare and invalu­able source of first­hand infor­ma­tion.
How­ev­er, sim­ply read­ing that col­lec­tion of let­ters can be con­fus­ing: if one is unfa­mil­iar with the recip­i­ents, under­stand­ing the con­tent will be dif­fi­cult; and due to copy­right and oth­er rea­sons, the col­lec­tion only con­tains one-sided cor­re­spon­dence, mak­ing it chal­leng­ing to ful­ly com­pre­hend the top­ics dis­cussed. There­fore, these let­ters may ini­tial­ly appear as scat­tered frag­ments. But with enough patience, arrang­ing these “frag­ments” in a cer­tain order, search­ing for more rel­e­vant infor­ma­tion to trans­form them into clear­ly defined, fleshed-out char­ac­ters and sto­ries, and employ­ing a bit of detec­tive work to uncov­er the con­nec­tions between them, grad­u­al­ly, a rather com­plete scroll emerges before our eyes. Ursu­la is pre­cise­ly the scroll itself.

Ear­ly child­hood read­ing pro­mo­tion cam­paigns in the Unit­ed States

To ful­ly appre­ci­ate this long scroll, a gen­er­al under­stand­ing of the progress of chil­dren’s read­ing pro­mo­tion in the Unit­ed States in the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry is nec­es­sary. Today, the Unit­ed States is clear­ly a super­pow­er in the field of chil­dren’s books, but in the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry, it was mere­ly a fol­low­er of Europe (espe­cial­ly Britain), and pira­cy was ram­pant. Beat­rix Pot­ter’s *Peter Rab­bit*, hailed as the “found­ing work of mod­ern pic­ture books,” was pub­lished in Britain in 1902, and pirat­ed copies appeared in the Unit­ed States just two years lat­er! How­ev­er, in this ris­ing super­pow­er, a move­ment was flour­ish­ing, and it was this move­ment that great­ly pro­pelled the devel­op­ment of Amer­i­can chil­dren’s books, grad­u­al­ly ele­vat­ing them to the top of the world. This was the Amer­i­can Chil­dren’s Library Move­ment, or, in mod­ern terms, the Amer­i­can chil­dren’s read­ing pro­mo­tion move­ment.
This book intro­duces the move­ment while recount­ing the sto­ry of the leg­endary chil­dren’s librar­i­an Vir­ginia Hav­i­land. Hav­i­land can be con­sid­ered a third-gen­er­a­tion pro­mot­er, while Anne Car­ole Moore, the head of the chil­dren’s book depart­ment at the New York Pub­lic Library, and Alice Jor­dan, Hav­i­land’s men­tor at the Boston Pub­lic Library, can be seen as sec­ond-gen­er­a­tion stan­dard-bear­ers. Because of this move­ment, the Unit­ed States began estab­lish­ing ded­i­cat­ed chil­dren’s read­ing rooms in pub­lic libraries in the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry. Librar­i­ans and enthu­si­as­tic mem­bers of the com­mu­ni­ty fre­quent­ly read chil­dren’s books aloud as a pri­ma­ry means of pro­mot­ing read­ing. At least by 1902, the Boston Pub­lic Library had ded­i­cat­ed sto­ry­tellers for chil­dren. Lat­er, Miss Pot­ter expressed great envy in a let­ter to Ms. Moore, as Britain was still quite con­ser­v­a­tive in this regard at the time.
It was pre­cise­ly because this pro­mo­tion became increas­ing­ly pop­u­lar that the demand for chil­dren’s books (espe­cial­ly trendy chil­dren’s books) grew, lead­ing major pub­lish­ing hous­es to estab­lish ded­i­cat­ed chil­dren’s book depart­ments. In 1919, the world’s first chil­dren’s book edi­to­r­i­al depart­ment was estab­lished at Macmil­lan Amer­i­can Com­pa­ny, with its found­ing edi­tor, Louise Beck­ett, only 25 years old and a few years after grad­u­at­ing from the pres­ti­gious Vas­sar Col­lege. Sub­se­quent­ly, Dou­ble­day, Vir­gin, Harp­er, and oth­er com­pa­nies also estab­lished chil­dren’s book depart­ments. Also in 1919, Ms. Moore, Mr. Matthews of the Boy Scouts of Amer­i­ca, and Mr. Melch­er, edi­tor of Pub­lish­ers Week­ly, joint­ly launched the first Chil­dren’s Book Week event; a few years lat­er, also at Melcher’s ini­tia­tive and spon­sor­ship, the Amer­i­can Library Asso­ci­a­tion’s Chil­dren’s Library Divi­sion estab­lished the New­bery Medal, and in 1922, 212 librar­i­an rep­re­sen­ta­tives vot­ed to select the first win­ner, *The Sto­ry of Mankind*. With this con­tin­ued impe­tus, in 1928, “The Mil­lion Cats,” cre­at­ed by Wan­da Geiger, a native Amer­i­can artist, was pub­lished. This work made chil­dren’s librar­i­ans, rep­re­sent­ed by Moore, par­tic­u­lar­ly proud, because it can be said to be the first orig­i­nal Amer­i­can pic­ture book of world-class quality—the soil that had been cul­ti­vat­ed for a long time final­ly bore fruit.

Green­wich Vil­lage

Ursu­la arrived in the ear­ly 1930s. Ini­tial­ly, she was a shy clerk in the col­lege text­book depart­ment of Harper’s Books. A few years lat­er, when she moved to the chil­dren’s book depart­ment, she quick­ly adapt­ed to her role and even­tu­al­ly became a land­mark edi­tor in the his­to­ry of Amer­i­can chil­dren’s book pub­lish­ing. In those ear­ly years, she pri­mar­i­ly lived in Green­wich Vil­lage.
Green­wich Vil­lage in Low­er Man­hat­tan, New York, is a place name men­tioned in many sto­ries in this book. We will see: William Pene de Bois and Kara Kuskin grow­ing up in this area; Ezra Jack Keats’ father work­ing as a wait­er in a café here, lying to young Keats that he had trad­ed soup for paint from a down-on-his-luck artist; Mar­co Simon and Robert McCloskey rais­ing ducks in the bath­tub of their shared apart­ment here, which lat­er became mod­els for “Make Way for Duck­lings”; Mar­garet Wise Brown study­ing ear­ly child­hood edu­ca­tion here and becom­ing a writer, and she also bought a detached house here as a stu­dio, where she com­plet­ed clas­sic pic­ture books such as “The Run­away Bun­ny” and “Good­night Moon”; Mar­garet and Ursu­la often met at a cor­ner café at break­fast time. It was a place where peo­ple would talk busi­ness; Clement Hurd, Leonard Weis­gard, Mau­rice Sendak, and Tom­my Unger all lived in this area. Sendak and Unger had sim­i­lar sched­ules and often met to chat dur­ing meal­times; H.A. Ray and his wife Mar­garet Ray lived here before mov­ing to Boston. See­ing Ursu­la liv­ing alone and feel­ing lone­ly, Mrs. Ray even brought her a small dog to care for her. Mr. Ray observed astron­o­my from the rooftop of a six-sto­ry apart­ment build­ing here and com­plet­ed his book, *Stars: A New Way of Observ­ing the Night*; E.B. White and Kather­ine White also lived here in their New York apart­ment, and Char­lotte Zolo­tov and her hus­band rent­ed a place here ear­ly in their mar­riage… It was once a gath­er­ing place for writ­ers, artists, and var­i­ous rad­i­cals and alter­na­tive indi­vid­u­als (includ­ing homo­sex­u­als). Even today, although it has trans­formed from a cheap apart­ment area into an upscale res­i­den­tial area with high land prices, many peo­ple in the arts still pre­fer to live there.
Look­ing back at Green­wich Vil­lage before the 1970s, it feels like a tru­ly sym­bol­ic vil­lage (even though it’s actu­al­ly made up of con­crete and steel blocks). Every­one in the vil­lage seemed to know each oth­er and had har­mo­nious rela­tion­ships, yet they were all keen to do their own thing, espe­cial­ly enjoy­ing being uncon­ven­tion­al. Many land­mark works in the his­to­ry of Amer­i­can chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture were con­ceived or nur­tured there.

From Bank Street to Fifth Avenue

There’s a Bank Street in Green­wich Vil­lage, actu­al­ly a small street nes­tled between West 11th and West 12th Streets, named after a New York bank that once stood there. But what tru­ly made this street world-famous was the Bank Street Edu­ca­tion Insti­tute, an exper­i­men­tal ear­ly child­hood edu­ca­tion insti­tu­tion found­ed there.
Fifth Avenue is a major north-south thor­ough­fare in Man­hat­tan, New York, and is always asso­ci­at­ed with ulti­mate lux­u­ry, as many of the world’s most pres­ti­gious lux­u­ry bou­tiques are locat­ed there. How­ev­er, sur­pris­ing­ly, in the heart of this prime loca­tion, there are also two libraries—the New York Pub­lic Library’s main branch and its Man­hat­tan branch.
The dis­tance from the for­mer site of the Bank Street Teach­ers Col­lege to the New York Pub­lic Library is about 3 kilo­me­ters, a mere 40-minute walk, which is quite close for a metrop­o­lis like New York. How­ev­er, in the first half of the 20th cen­tu­ry, they sur­pris­ing­ly became almost mor­tal ene­mies in the field of chil­dren’s books.
The stan­dard-bear­er of the Bank Street Acad­e­my of Edu­ca­tion was its founder, Lucy Michelle, who was also Mar­garet Wise Brown’s men­tor. She found­ed the acad­e­my and an exper­i­men­tal kinder­garten at the same time. Lat­er, she encour­aged a par­ent of a kinder­garten child to found Scott Com­pa­ny, which main­ly pub­lished works by mem­bers of the “Here and Now” cre­ative exper­i­men­tal group. Mar­garet was the found­ing edi­tor and lead­ing writer.
The stan­dard-bear­er of the library camp was Ms. Moore, men­tioned ear­li­er. She played a cru­cial role in pro­mot­ing chil­dren’s read­ing, but in terms of read­ing taste, she pre­ferred tra­di­tion­al clas­sics and fairy tales with the ele­gant style of the Vic­to­ri­an era. She dis­liked real­is­tic works and works that devi­at­ed from tra­di­tion­al tech­niques, and she was also averse to incor­po­rat­ing mod­ern art into chil­dren’s books. She was extreme­ly opposed to the “here and now” cre­ative con­cept advo­cat­ed by Michelle Oba­ma, which empha­sized con­tem­po­rary life expe­ri­ences, and nat­u­ral­ly dis­liked Mar­garet. In her lat­er years, Ms. Moore became even more nar­row-mind­ed, dis­lik­ing both the “Lit­tle House” series and “Char­lot­te’s Web.” Because of Moore’s sig­nif­i­cant influ­ence in the chil­dren’s library com­mu­ni­ty, works she dis­liked often missed out on major awards and were even exclud­ed from pub­lic library rec­om­mend­ed read­ing lists, thus great­ly affect­ing the pro­mo­tion and sales of her works.
Although Mar­garet was Michelle Oba­ma’s most prized stu­dent and assis­tant, her unique poet­ic tem­pera­ment and lit­er­ary sen­si­tiv­i­ty allowed her to sur­pass (and to some extent “betray”) her men­tor. Her most suc­cess­ful works, while embody­ing the “here and now” con­cept, also ful­ly retained poet­ic fan­ta­sy and fairy­tale charm. Ursu­la, born in the same year as her, was actu­al­ly three months old­er than Mar­garet, but she great­ly admired her and was deeply influ­enced by her in chil­dren’s book cre­ation and edit­ing. They also shared a love for mod­ern art that empha­sized free expres­sion, nat­u­ral­ly attract­ing artists like Hart and Weis­gard to their side. Although Mar­garet trag­i­cal­ly passed away pre­ma­ture­ly, the influ­ence of the exper­i­men­tal cre­ative group at the Bank Street Teach­ers Col­lege con­tin­ued to fer­ment and grad­u­al­ly expand. Her suc­ces­sor, Ruth Krause, joined forces with her hus­band, Kroger John­son, a left-wing artist, and with the help of the fledg­ling Mau­rice Sendak, to cre­ate a series of inno­v­a­tive works that were quite sub­ver­sive for that era.
For­tu­nate­ly, the chil­dren’s library and chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture crit­i­cism com­mu­ni­ties grad­u­al­ly opened up. We saw influ­en­tial crit­ics such as Lindqvist, edi­tor of *Horn Book* mag­a­zine; Hav­il­land, a promi­nent fig­ure in chil­dren’s libraries; Gina Suther­land, edi­tor of *Chil­dren’s Book Cen­ter Newslet­ter*; and George Woods, edi­tor of the chil­dren’s sec­tion of *The New York Times Book Review*, all sid­ing with the reformist camp rep­re­sent­ed by Ursu­la and oth­ers. More and more chil­dren’s librar­i­ans re-exam­ined their pre­vi­ous judg­ments and grad­u­al­ly revised them in var­i­ous ways. Although they were unable to award any of the books in the “Lit­tle House” series a major prize, they even­tu­al­ly estab­lished a new life­time achieve­ment award for their creators—the Roland Ingalls Wilder Award, which was lat­er award­ed to E.B. White, author of *Char­lot­te’s Web*. In 1964, they even award­ed the Calde­cott Medal to *Where the Wild Things Are*, which was quite con­tro­ver­sial upon its release. Even Sendak lat­er said, “That was per­haps the most sur­pris­ing event of my entire life.”

Before the cur­tain of his­to­ry

The 61 indi­vid­u­als fea­tured in this book are cul­tur­al elites active in the Amer­i­can chil­dren’s book world after the 1930s, all of whom are heavy­weight fig­ures in terms of their achieve­ments and sta­tus. Let’s take a look at their com­po­si­tion through some data.

《天才们的那些事儿》序言(暂定稿)
《天才们的那些事儿》序言(暂定稿)
《天才们的那些事儿》序言(暂定稿)



Of these, 34 were women, a slight major­i­ty. Con­sid­er­ing that chil­dren’s book edi­tors (such as Ursu­la and Susan Hirschman) and chil­dren’s librar­i­ans at that time were all women, the gen­der ratio among chil­dren’s book cre­ators was rough­ly 50–50. In terms of birth­place, over 20% of the cre­ators were born in Europe, a char­ac­ter­is­tic of the Unit­ed States as a nation of immi­grants. In terms of eth­nic­i­ty, Jew­ish peo­ple made up over a quar­ter of the cre­ators. What explains this?
Let’s try plac­ing these genius­es of chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture with­in the broad­er con­text of Amer­i­can his­to­ry.
Start­ing with Roland Ingalls Wilder, her upbring­ing was shaped by the west­ward expan­sion of the Unit­ed States in the mid-to-late 19th cen­tu­ry. Janet Sper­ber Lowry and Fred Gib­son also expe­ri­enced sim­i­lar pio­neer­ing fam­i­ly life. How­ev­er, you might notice that Wilder’s “Lit­tle House” series was pub­lished after 1932, dur­ing the most dif­fi­cult years of the Great Depres­sion. It is pre­cise­ly at this time that such sto­ries res­onat­ed so wide­ly.
From the mid-19th cen­tu­ry to the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry, the Unit­ed States expe­ri­enced sev­er­al large-scale waves of immi­gra­tion, with Euro­pean Jews being the most promi­nent. Among the immi­grants were rel­a­tive­ly wealthy Ger­man and Aus­tri­an Jews, such as the ances­tors of Ruth Krauss and Mary Rogers, but many more were impov­er­ished Jews from East­ern Europe and Rus­sia, such as the fathers of Ezra Jack Git­zo, Mau­rice Sendak, Nat Hentoff, and Shel Sil­ver­stein. These impov­er­ished Jews pri­mar­i­ly clus­tered in the slums of Low­er Man­hat­tan and Brook­lyn, lat­er dis­pers­ing to cities like Boston and Chica­go. The two World Wars, pri­mar­i­ly fought in Europe, fur­ther drove a large num­ber of Euro­pean cul­tur­al elites to the Unit­ed States. Isaac Singer, H.A. Ray and Mar­garet Ray, Maya Woj­ciochs­ka, and Leo Lion­ni, among oth­ers, essen­tial­ly fled to Amer­i­ca. After the war, Tom­my Unger­er, Eric Car­le, Ani­ta Lobel, and oth­ers, who had suf­fered great­ly from the con­flict, immi­grat­ed to the Unit­ed States. The two world wars and the Great Depres­sion that occurred in between, while hav­ing a sig­nif­i­cant eco­nom­ic impact on the Unit­ed States, actu­al­ly pro­vid­ed this immi­grant nation with excel­lent devel­op­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties, even in the field of chil­dren’s books.
In the ear­ly Cold War fol­low­ing World War II, the polit­i­cal atmos­phere in the Unit­ed States was extreme­ly tense, with McCarthy­ism ram­pant. Many left-wing writ­ers were per­se­cut­ed, unable to pub­lish their works or teach normally—in oth­er words, their liveli­hoods were almost cut off. For­tu­nate­ly, cen­sor­ship in the field of chil­dren’s books was not so strict, and there were also chil­dren’s book edi­tors like Ursu­la who yearned for free­dom and were fear­less. This attract­ed a group of left-wing writ­ers, such as John­son Krogert and Mil­li­cent E. Sel­sum, to show­case their tal­ents in the field of chil­dren’s books. We can prob­a­bly owe a debt of grat­i­tude, in part, to the peri­od of McCarthy­ism that allowed us to have such a bril­liant chil­dren’s book as *Arrow Has a Col­ored Pen­cil*.
Mov­ing into the 1960s, we entered one of the most event­ful peri­ods in Amer­i­can his­to­ry: the Civ­il Rights Move­ment, the Viet­nam War and the anti-war move­ment, the assas­si­na­tions of Pres­i­dent Kennedy and Mar­tin Luther King Jr., the wom­en’s rights move­ment, the sex­u­al lib­er­a­tion move­ment, and vio­lent clash­es between homo­sex­u­als and police… Inter­est­ing­ly, many land­mark works in the world of chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture were also born dur­ing this era. For exam­ple, the first pic­ture book fea­tur­ing a Black child as the pro­tag­o­nist, *Snowy Day*, won the 1963 Calde­cott Medal; in 1969, John Step­toe, a Black artist not yet 19 years old, pub­lished his acclaimed debut pic­ture book, *Steve*; and in the same year, the first young adult nov­el to address homo­sex­u­al­i­ty, *The Way We Were*, was also pub­lished.
This is no acci­dent. When we place the tra­jec­to­ries of these genius­es before the back­drop of his­to­ry, every­thing seems nat­ur­al.

Mav­er­ick genius­es

How­ev­er, while it is said that heroes are made by the times—some spe­cial fig­ures always emerge in a par­tic­u­lar era—why are these the spe­cif­ic peo­ple who emerge? There must be some mys­tery behind it.
In this book, we’ve com­piled a resume for each genius, imag­in­ing them apply­ing for jobs. We envi­sioned these resumes as boast­ing envi­able expe­ri­ences, but in real­i­ty, most resumes, judg­ing sole­ly from fam­i­ly back­ground, edu­ca­tion, and work expe­ri­ence, are quite unre­mark­able. In the job mar­ket, they’d like­ly be just can­di­dates for office clerks or graph­ic design­ers. For exam­ple, H.A. Ray dropped out of col­lege, and his main work expe­ri­ence was sell­ing bath­tubs; San­dak only had a high school diplo­ma, attend­ed a few nights of art school, and his main work expe­ri­ence was win­dow dec­o­rat­ing a toy store; Sil­ver­stein also strug­gled in col­lege, drew comics dur­ing his mil­i­tary ser­vice, and after his dis­charge, worked as a hot dog stand own­er; E.B. White, despite attend­ing the pres­ti­gious Cor­nell Uni­ver­si­ty, changed jobs at least five times in four years after grad­u­a­tion, either resign­ing or being fired… In short, before reach­ing their peak, most of these indi­vid­u­als lived ordi­nary, aim­less lives, some even strug­gling to make ends meet for near­ly half their lives. Yet, they all ulti­mate­ly sur­passed them­selves. What’s the secret?
Ursu­la revealed a bit of the secret in a let­ter she wrote to Sendak on Jan­u­ary 31, 1963. She wrote, “You don’t belong to the ‘dif­fi­cult genius’ type. First of all, genius­es are nat­u­ral­ly dif­fi­cult…” This state­ment, com­ing from Ursu­la who dealt with these kinds of peo­ple every day, seems quite rea­son­able. How­ev­er, in the eyes of anoth­er bril­liant edi­tor, Susan Hirschman, only Ursu­la tru­ly deserved the title of genius, because Ursu­la her­self was dif­fi­cult enough. Back then, it was Ursu­la who fired Susan from Harp­er! This “dif­fi­cul­ty” was actu­al­ly a state of being uncon­ven­tion­al, which to out­siders seemed sim­ply to be doing things her own way, even to the point of being obses­sive.
Don’t be fooled by the fact that these “genius­es” are top fig­ures in the chil­dren’s book world, and their works are so cap­ti­vat­ing, espe­cial­ly for so many chil­dren world­wide. Almost every one of them has some “quirks,” and often, the greater their achieve­ments, the more pro­nounced these quirks become. Of course, “quirks” here sim­ply refers to their unique­ness. Some of these quirks are per­fect­ly healthy from any per­spec­tive. For exam­ple, Romain Rol­land, a pio­neer­ing farmer, always wrote dili­gent­ly in his spare time—a writ­ing habit that can be con­sid­ered a virtue. M.E. Ker­r’s pen name pref­er­ence, orig­i­nat­ing from neces­si­ty, grad­u­al­ly became a cel­e­brat­ed sto­ry. How­ev­er, once these quirks delve deep­er, even chal­leng­ing the entrenched eth­i­cal val­ues of soci­ety, they often become embroiled in con­flict and con­tro­ver­sy. This is pre­cise­ly what makes the sto­ries of these genius­es so intrigu­ing; land­mark works often emerge from con­tro­ver­sy, and when they ulti­mate­ly over­come it, they become even more pow­er­ful.
In the words of the rest­less Eva Gal­lian: “Those who are born gen­tle, calm, and free from trou­ble, who are always able to stay away from vio­lent emo­tions and evil temptations—those who nev­er have to fight along­side angels at night and win with a limp at dawn—can nev­er become great saints.”

Growth in var­i­ous forms

Every par­tic­i­pant in com­pil­ing the infor­ma­tion and writ­ing the sto­ries of these genius­es in this book is a par­ent of one of the chil­dren. We could­n’t help but want to explore their growth path in the hope of learn­ing some­thing from them.
In sum­ma­ry, the paths to suc­cess for these genius­es are incred­i­bly diverse. Some came from very wealthy fam­i­lies, but genius­es raised in priv­i­leged cir­cum­stances often seem more prone to rebel­lion, such as Clement Hurd and Mary Rogers. Oth­ers came from impov­er­ished back­grounds, but this fos­tered resilience, like Ezra Jack Kitz. Gen­er­al­ly speak­ing, how­ev­er, most of these genius­es came from fam­i­lies with mod­est eco­nom­ic cir­cum­stances. Wealth­i­er fam­i­lies tend­ed to have a stronger artis­tic atmos­phere, while those less afflu­ent seemed to have clos­er fam­i­ly bonds. We often see that in less afflu­ent fam­i­lies, the bonds between sib­lings are often deep­er. Par­ents may be pre­oc­cu­pied with mak­ing a liv­ing, but the influ­ence between the chil­dren is immea­sur­able. In the devel­op­ment of Singer, Syd, White, Gib­son, Dejoun, and Kitz, the influ­ence and sup­port from their sib­lings played a cru­cial role.

《天才们的那些事儿》序言(暂定稿)
As men­tioned above, their edu­ca­tion­al back­ground reveals that only 60% of this group com­plet­ed col­lege, 20% attend­ed col­lege but did not grad­u­ate, and anoth­er 20% either com­plet­ed high school or had unknown edu­ca­tion­al back­grounds. Of those who grad­u­at­ed, only sev­en went on to obtain a mas­ter’s degree or a dual degree. Of these, only one was male: Mr. Dono­van, who com­plet­ed his Mas­ter of Laws, but he lat­er changed careers. Near­ly 60% of these grad­u­ates were women, per­haps because, in their era, women seek­ing to make a liv­ing were more reliant on a col­lege degree. How­ev­er, for the vast major­i­ty of these indi­vid­u­als, the majors they stud­ied in col­lege often dif­fered sig­nif­i­cant­ly from the suc­cess­ful careers they ulti­mate­ly pur­sued. Their career suc­cess is large­ly due to inter­ests and habits cul­ti­vat­ed from child­hood, pri­mar­i­ly draw­ing and read­ing in the field of chil­dren’s books. If there was one com­mon thread grow­ing up, it was read­ing. Regard­less of their fam­i­ly back­grounds, they all shared a pas­sion for read­ing from a young age. Those who have a pen­chant for art often devel­op a habit of con­stant­ly paint­ing from a young age. For exam­ple, HA Lei, who trav­eled to the Ama­zon Basin in Brazil to sell bath­tubs, sketched mon­keys along the way. It would be strange if such peo­ple did­n’t become painters.
Anoth­er point worth not­ing is that these genius­es in the field of chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture, regard­less of whether their child­hoods can be inter­pret­ed as hap­py, are cer­tain­ly mem­o­rable. Child­hood mem­o­ries are an inex­haustible source of wealth for their cre­ations. More­over, even in the least remark­able child­hoods, they were always sur­round­ed by peo­ple who deeply loved and cared for them, offer­ing encour­age­ment and sup­port. The pow­er of love is more ben­e­fi­cial to growth than abun­dant mate­r­i­al con­di­tions. And the most envi­able child­hoods are often those very close to nature—on the grass­lands, on farms, in the moun­tains, by rivers, lakes, and seas—whether set­tled down or on extend­ed vaca­tions. Such envi­ron­ments, cou­pled with good edu­ca­tion and warm fam­i­ly affec­tion, are how genius­es like Roland Ingalls Wilder and E.B. White were nur­tured.

Suc­cess and hap­pi­ness

When dis­cussing lit­er­ary his­to­ry, peo­ple usu­al­ly only ask about the val­ue of the works, the authors’ con­tri­bu­tions, and their place in lit­er­ary his­to­ry. Almost no one asks: Were those authors hap­py? Does read­ing their works bring hap­pi­ness to read­ers? — Such ques­tions seem to have no his­tor­i­cal val­ue, or per­haps are unan­swer­able. How­ev­er, when we talk about chil­dren’s books, these ques­tions seem very valu­able: Was the author of *Char­lot­te’s Web* hap­py? Does read­ing *Char­lot­te’s Web* bring hap­pi­ness to read­ers (main­ly chil­dren)? — If you love chil­dren and cher­ish child­hood, how could you not care about such ques­tions?
In com­pil­ing the sto­ries of these genius­es, we paid spe­cial atten­tion to this ques­tion. While it’s impos­si­ble to inter­view each of them, let alone ask ques­tions like “Are you hap­py?”, by read­ing their auto­bi­ogra­phies, biogra­phies, and inter­views, access­ing rel­e­vant audio­vi­su­al mate­ri­als, and observ­ing their actions, I dis­cov­ered that, as a cre­ative group, suc­cess­ful chil­dren’s book cre­ators are per­haps the hap­pi­est group among all lit­er­ary cre­ators. Per­haps there are one or two excep­tions, but almost all chil­dren’s book cre­ators are very sat­is­fied with their read­ers. They may leave behind quite intense con­flicts in their sto­ries, reveal­ing the poten­tial­ly dark­er side of human nature, but almost all of them ulti­mate­ly make a fairy­tale-like promise: they lived hap­pi­ly ever after… And those par­tic­u­lar­ly sin­cere genius­es don’t see this promise as a con­ve­nient decep­tion, but rather gen­uine­ly seek solu­tions, com­fort­ing young read­ers while also heal­ing their own past trau­mas. Just as Hayao Kawai dis­cov­ered in *The Uni­verse of Chil­dren*, child­hood pos­sess­es a pow­er­ful force that not only helps chil­dren but also great­ly ben­e­fits adults.
Mau­rice Sendak was per­haps one of the most pro­found genius­es to dis­cov­er this secret, and his entire cre­ative life seemed to be a form of heal­ing, espe­cial­ly for the deep trau­ma he him­self suf­fered from fear dur­ing his child­hood. Approach­ing 80, his part­ner of over half a cen­tu­ry was about to pass away. He stayed by her side in the hos­pi­tal, while he him­self fell ill on his own bed; the lone­li­ness, help­less­ness, and grief he felt were unimag­in­able to oth­ers. It was dur­ing this time that he con­ceived a new pic­ture book. After his part­ner’s pass­ing, he con­tin­ued to immerse him­self in his work, final­ly pub­lish­ing “Adi the Pig” at the age of 83 (the year before his death). This is per­haps the most light­heart­ed and cheer­ful pic­ture book Sendak cre­at­ed in his life­time. Although born into a very ortho­dox Jew­ish fam­i­ly, Sendak was not reli­gious. He said he great­ly envied those who were reli­gious, because liv­ing in this world with­out faith is des­tined to be much more dif­fi­cult. How­ev­er, he ulti­mate­ly per­se­vered, com­plet­ing a very ful­fill­ing and almost regret­less life, prob­a­bly because he found his own way of praying—creating chil­dren’s books for chil­dren, and for him­self.
Those genius­es who cre­ate chil­dren’s books must expe­ri­ence an inde­scrib­able hap­pi­ness when their suc­cess is built on a per­fect con­nec­tion with child­hood.


Ajia …
Writ­ten in Bei­jing on April 23, 2015