[Notes] How reading helps writing

   
There is no oth­er way to improve your writ­ing than to read wide­ly.——This is almost a well-known secret and com­mon sense.
 
   
But the oppo­site state­ment may not be true:Does exten­sive read­ing nec­es­sar­i­ly improve writ­ing?——There are many peo­ple who have read a lot but don’t want to write or always feel that they can’t write well. What’s going on?
 
   
Frank Smith in his Read­ing With­out
The book Non­sense (Get­ting Rid of Mean­ing­less Read­ing) pro­vides a very good idea, which inspired me a lot.
 
   
Chap­ter 9, “Join­ing the Club of
Read­ers begins by describ­ing the many ben­e­fits of hav­ing your child join a read­ers’ club.As the sum­ma­ry notes of the pre­vi­ous chap­tersAs explained in the book, Pro­fes­sor Smith’s “join­ing a club,” whether it’s a read­ers’ club, a writ­ers’ club, or a com­bined read­ing and writ­ing club, is a metaphor, not a lit­er­al one. Anoth­er way to put it is to make chil­dren feel like they have become or are learn­ing to become a mem­ber of a group of read­ers (writ­ers).
 
   
There are many ben­e­fits to get­ting chil­dren to “join the club” in this way, such as:
 
   
They can see writ­ten lan­guage in action;

   
☆ As new mem­bers, chil­dren nat­u­ral­ly have the free­dom to make mis­takes with­out being crit­i­cized;

   
☆ Senior mem­bers will help new mem­bers become experts;

   

Chil­dren are quick­ly accept­ed into the club’s full range of activ­i­ties, and they can choose those activ­i­ties that they find inter­est­ing and use­ful (rather than being forced to do use­less work that is of no inter­est to them);

   
Most impor­tant­ly, chil­dren learn to accept them­selves as mem­bers of the club (i.e., as read­ers or writ­ers);

   
☆ All learn­ing process­es are no longer risky. In oth­er words, there is no need to wor­ry about con­stant­ly increas­ing exams, tests or exer­cis­es;

   

 
   
When these advan­tages are viewed in the con­text of read­ing, they are easy to under­stand: they are effec­tive con­di­tions for help­ing chil­dren fall in love with read­ing and, of course, learn to read. But how should we view them in the con­text of writ­ing?
 
   
We say:You learn to read by read­ing
read­ing
So, is it nat­ur­al that you learn to write by writ­ing?
by writ­ing)?
 
   
Pro­fes­sor Frank Smith stat­ed with great cer­tain­ty:You learn to write by read­ing.
to write by read­ing)!

 
   
Here, Pro­fes­sor Smith still clear­ly crit­i­cizes some com­mon writ­ing teach­ing meth­ods, espe­cial­ly the mechan­i­cal teach­ing meth­ods that focus on punc­tu­a­tion, spelling, and error cor­rec­tion. His core rea­son is:Through this kind of writ­ing learn­ing, chil­dren make few­er and few­er writ­ing errors and have less and less inter­est in writ­ing!

   
Sim­ply grad­ing chil­dren’s arti­cles does not help them improve their writ­ing skills, but it has a huge effect on estab­lish­ing their self-image, espe­cial­ly in com­plete­ly destroy­ing their self-con­fi­dence — mak­ing them feel that they are “not cut out for writ­ing” because writ­ing is so dif­fi­cult and mean­ing­less, and they can com­plete­ly despair of it!
 
   
So how does “get your kid into the club” style of read­ing affect writ­ing?
 
   
Besides insist­ing on the afore­men­tioned advan­tages of “join­ing the club,” Smith reveals the secret:Learn to read like a writer!
 
   
The orig­i­nal words are as fol­lows:If you see your­self as a writer, you read as a
writer, which means that you read as if you might be writ­ing what
you are at the moment
If you think of your­self as a writer, you will read like a writer, mean­ing you will read as if you were like­ly to write the kind of writ­ing you are read­ing.

 
   
This state­ment might sound a bit awk­ward at first, but let me give you an exam­ple. Take the Har­ry Pot­ter series, for exam­ple. This fan­ta­sy nov­el series is not only cap­ti­vat­ing but also inspires many chil­dren and adults to want to write sim­i­lar sto­ries them­selves. Once this urge is aroused, read­ers expe­ri­ence a sub­tle shift when they read this nov­el, or sim­i­lar mag­i­cal or fan­ta­sy sto­ries, again. They become involved in the sto­ry’s writ­ing process, feel­ing as if the author is also express­ing their own (or per­haps unin­ten­tion­al) thoughts, or think­ing, “I would have writ­ten it this way” or “I would­n’t have writ­ten it that way.” Thus, they cease being mere­ly pas­sive read­ers and become eager writ­ers-in-train­ing!
 
   
There­fore, the secret revealed by Smith can be under­stood as fol­lows:Not all read­ing states will nec­es­sar­i­ly pro­mote the read­er’s writ­ing. Only when a per­son con­sid­ers him­self a writer can his read­ing state like a writer be of real help to his writ­ing.
 
   
How­ev­er, Smith also empha­sizes that “learn­ing to write through read­ing” does­n’t mean that writ­ing prac­tice itself is unim­por­tant. Writ­ing prac­tice can help learn­ers see them­selves as writ­ers. Cor­rect­ing mis­takes and improv­ing writ­ing skills are inevitable process­es (and often a nat­ur­al con­se­quence) dur­ing writ­ing prac­tice, but they are not some­thing to be empha­sized. Writ­ing guides (teach­ers) should appro­pri­ate­ly help learn­ers cor­rect mis­takes sim­ply to help them write bet­ter. The rela­tion­ship between them should be one of friend­ly col­lab­o­ra­tion.
 
   
【A lit­tle sup­ple­ment】
   
Regard­ing read­ing that aids writ­ing, I’d like to empha­size anoth­er point. I believe the con­cept of “read­ing” should be broad­er, extend­ing beyond sim­ply read­ing books or pure­ly writ­ten mate­ri­als. Read­ers who con­sid­er them­selves writ­ers should look beyond the mere “use of writ­ten lan­guage” and see more, because writ­ing is essen­tial­ly the descrip­tion of events and the expres­sion of thoughts and emo­tions. When read­ing to aid writ­ing, acquir­ing rich mate­r­i­al and con­tent is far more impor­tant than learn­ing the forms of expres­sion.
 
Argen­tine Primera Diary, Feb­ru­ary 17, 2010, Guangzhou

 【Relat­ed Notes】

[Notes] Chap­ter Sum­ma­ry of “Get­ting Rid of Mean­ing­less Read­ing”

[Notes] 9+N Com­mon Con­fu­sions in Guid­ing Chil­dren to Read