[Notes] 9+N Common Confusions in Guiding Children to Read

   
I am cur­rent­ly read­ing Pro­fes­sor Frank Smith’sRead­ing With­out
Non­sense
(It could prob­a­bly be trans­lat­ed as “Get­ting Rid of Mean­ing­less Read­ing”), and I res­onat­ed with the nine com­mon con­fu­sions he described. This book is pri­mar­i­ly aimed at read­ing teach­ers, but it’s also quite inspir­ing for par­ents. Also, although Frank Smith describes nine prob­lems, they’re actu­al­ly built on sev­er­al basic ques­tions and raise a whole series of oth­er issues, so I can only say “9 + N” prob­lems ^_^
 
   
Con­fu­sion 1: Is it nec­es­sary to help chil­dren mas­ter the rules of read­ing as ear­ly as pos­si­ble?
   
Are there spe­cif­ic rules for read­ing, gen­er­al­ly speak­ing? If so, what rules should be taught? Are they gram­mat­i­cal rules or tech­ni­cal read­ing rules?
 
   
Con­fu­sion 2: Do I need to make sure I learn and use pro­nun­ci­a­tion rules first?
   
——Phon­ic in Eng­lish
Rules, in Chi­nese, prob­a­bly refer to pinyin rules and pro­nun­ci­a­tion rules. To put it sim­ply, to guide chil­dren to read, do we need to teach them pinyin first or teach them to read aloud first?
 
   
Con­fu­sion 3: Is it nec­es­sary to teach words one by one before con­tin­u­ing with read­ing activ­i­ties to ensure that every word in the read­ing mate­r­i­al has been learned?
   
——Con­verse­ly, if you think you don’t need to learn “every word”, then what per­cent­age of words do you need to learn at least? Or is there anoth­er way to put it…
 
   
Con­fu­sion 4: Should “read­ing word for word” be the main teach­ing goal?
   
——The so-called “word-per­fect read­ing” is Word-Per­fect
Read­ing can also mean read­ing with every detail in mind and with­out miss­ing a sin­gle word.
 
   
Con­fu­sion 5: Should we encour­age chil­dren to make blind guess­es while read­ing? Should we empha­size that chil­dren should be cau­tious and care­ful while read­ing?

   
The trans­la­tion of “blind guess” is too strong, as it actu­al­ly means “guess­ing”, but “guess” is too weak. In short, the mean­ing is whether we can find ways to help chil­dren devel­op the habit (or atti­tude) of being care­ful, cau­tious, and rig­or­ous in read­ing.
 
   
Con­fu­sion 6: Should we empha­size main­tain­ing read­ing accu­ra­cy at all times?
   
——This “accu­ra­cy” not only refers to the accu­ra­cy of mean­ing, but also the accu­ra­cy of words, phras­es and sen­tences. For exam­ple, when read­ing (espe­cial­ly read­ing aloud), peo­ple often inad­ver­tent­ly replace the orig­i­nal expres­sion with their own famil­iar way of speak­ing.
 
   
Con­fu­sion 7: Should children’s mis­takes in read­ing be point­ed out and cor­rect­ed imme­di­ate­ly?
    This is prob­a­bly some­thing par­ents and teach­ers often do. How should we view it?
 
   
Con­fu­sion 8: Do “chil­dren with read­ing dif­fi­cul­ties” (or “chil­dren with dyslex­ia”) need to be iden­ti­fied ear­ly and giv­en spe­cial tutor­ing?
 
   
Con­fu­sion 9: Dur­ing read­ing guid­ance, do we need to take every pos­si­ble oppor­tu­ni­ty to help chil­dren improve their writ­ing and writ­ten expres­sion skills? Do we need to empha­size that chil­dren’s oral expres­sion should be as accu­rate and stan­dard­ized as pos­si­ble?

   
——Read­ing itself has the poten­tial to help chil­dren improve and per­fect their writ­ing skills, writ­ten expres­sion skills, and oral expres­sion skills. So in the process of guid­ing read­ing, what is the appro­pri­ate way to tar­get these abil­i­ties?
 
   
The above are 9 con­fu­sions. The dis­cus­sion of these issues is actu­al­ly based on the fol­low­ing two ques­tions:
 
   
Ques­tion 9+1: Can children’s read­ing skills be taught?

 
   
Ques­tion 9+2: As adult read­ers, can you review how our read­ing skills were “taught”?

 
   
There may be two dif­fer­ent answers to ques­tion 9+1, so two more ques­tions are extend­ed:
 
   
Ques­tion 9+1 Affir­ma­tion: If children’s read­ing skills can be taught, how is it taught?

 
   
Ques­tion 9+1 denial: If children’s read­ing abil­i­ty is not learned through spe­cial teach­ing, then what should we adults (teach­ers and par­ents) do?

 
   
Stop, let me explain this much for now, oth­er­wise I will be con­fused, O(∩_∩)O haha~
 
Argen­tine Primera Divi­sion
Feb­ru­ary 8, 2010, Guangzhou
 
* * * * * * *
Appen­dix: Some high­lights
   
After sort­ing out these 9 puz­zles, it sud­den­ly occurred to me that I won­dered what chil­dren would think of them. This is a very inter­est­ing idea. If you are free, you can also “spy” on the chil­dren around you.
   
The fol­low­ing response was from an unnamed ele­men­tary school stu­dent. I found it quite amus­ing and inspir­ing, and I’m repro­duc­ing it below:
 
   
To answer the first ques­tion: What rules? I don’t under­stand. Let him read what­ev­er he likes! But if he only likes Rain­bow Cat and Blue Rab­bit, Pleas­ant Goat and Big Big Wolf, or Ma Xiao­tiao… (Are you say­ing he only likes “junk”?)… how can you call it “junk”? Some of it is actu­al­ly quite inter­est­ing… (Then call it “fast food.” I don’t mean any­thing else. We read and eat a lot of “junk” our­selves, and we live well.)… What I mean is, if he only likes those books, then take him shop­ping and look at oth­er inter­est­ing books togeth­er…
 
   
To answer the sec­ond ques­tion: Does the child under­stand its mean­ing? … (You mean the main thing is to read the “mean­ing,” right? Pro­nun­ci­a­tion is not impor­tant?) … Pro­nun­ci­a­tion can be learned lat­er. But you can also read it aloud.
 
   
Answer to Con­fu­sion 3: That’s not nec­es­sar­i­ly true. You can just guess. I’m usu­al­ly too lazy to ask, and my par­ents are too lazy to answer. It’s so annoy­ing to always have me look up words in the dic­tio­nary.
 
   
Answer to ques­tion 4: This is not called read­ing, this is study­ing in class!
 
   
Answer to Con­fu­sion 5: Let him guess. Maybe the mean­ing is wrong, but that’s okay! For exam­ple, I used to read “米露辛” as “米露坎”, but that’s okay. Now I under­stand, don’t I?
 
   
Answer to con­fu­sion six: Any­way, mom and dad nev­er empha­size it.
 
   
Answer to Con­fu­sion #7: You can point it out and cor­rect it. How­ev­er, cor­rect­ing them all the time can be annoy­ing, so try a dif­fer­ent approach. For exam­ple, if your baby pro­nounces “欣” (Xin) as “坎” (Kan), you can say, “Hey baby, do you know the char­ac­ter for “欣喜” (Xin)? If it were pro­nounced as “坎喜” (Kanxi), would­n’t that be weird?” (Oh, I see. You mean cor­rect­ing them in a play­ful way, right?)
 
   
Ques­tion 8: What is dyslex­ia? I don’t know. (Then for­get about this ques­tion, haha)
 
   
Answer to Con­fused 9: It all depends on the child’s inter­est! If they’re inter­est­ed, give it a try; if not, for­get it…