[Random Thoughts] Conjectures and Formulas about Adults’ “Childhood Experiences”…

   
Late one night on the win­ter sol­stice of 2006, a word and a for­mu­la some­how popped into my head. It was quite intrigu­ing. I lit the light and grabbed a pen and paper to jot it down, lest I for­get it the next day. While I could still under­stand it, I wrote it down below:
 
   
Child­hood Expe­ri­ence
   
Axiom 1: Child­hood has a sig­nif­i­cant impact on a per­son­’s life.
           
Exam­ple 1: Isn’t it often said that “you can tell a person’s future at the age of three and his old age at the age of sev­en”?
   
Axiom 2: Every­one has only one child­hood.
   
Axiom 3: Every­one has only one child­hood.
   
Corol­lary 1: Due to the irre­versibil­i­ty of growth, child­hood has only one chance and one direc­tion to have a sig­nif­i­cant impact on a per­son.
   
Hypoth­e­sis 1: Adults may reshape them­selves by re-expe­ri­enc­ing their child­hood.
   
The­o­rem 1: Read­ing lit­er­ary works is a spe­cial way of expe­ri­enc­ing life.

   
Hypoth­e­sis 2: Read­ing lit­er­ary works about child­hood (main­ly but not lim­it­ed to chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture) is a spe­cial way to expe­ri­ence child­hood.

   
Hypoth­e­sis 3: One’s own child­hood mem­o­ries are the most effec­tive chan­nel for child­hood expe­ri­ences.

   
Con­jec­ture about causal­i­ty
    His­to­ry and real­i­ty are like two con­nect­ed ponds. If you throw a stone in one, rip­ples will appear in the oth­er. But you can nev­er be sure how the two inter­act.
   
Exam­ple 2: Freud’s ideas about the for­ma­tion of the sub­con­scious and about “libido” all refer to peo­ple’s child­hood.
   
Hypoth­e­sis 4: If psy­cho­analy­sis can change a per­son­’s cur­rent sit­u­a­tion and future, then the same can be done through child­hood expe­ri­ences.
   
Ques­tion 1: How do you gain a sense of your child­hood through read­ing lit­er­a­ture about child­hood (pri­mar­i­ly chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture)? How do you describe it?
   
Hypoth­e­sis: Get ref­er­ence and reflec­tion from the child­hood expe­ri­ences of oth­ers to tran­scend one’s own lim­i­ta­tions, such as men gain­ing the child­hood expe­ri­ences of women, peo­ple with supe­ri­or liv­ing con­di­tions gain­ing the expe­ri­ence of a mis­er­able child­hood, peo­ple in peace­time gain­ing the expe­ri­ence of a child­hood in wartime, and so on.

   
Hypoth­e­sis 5: Chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture is the most social lit­er­ary read­ing. ① It usu­al­ly requires adults to read to chil­dren; ②
Even if adults don’t read to chil­dren, they often need to “pre­view” or inter­vene in oth­er ways;
Chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture orig­i­nates from the folk tra­di­tion of “sto­ry­telling”;…

   
Hypoth­e­sis 6: Chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture is also lit­er­a­ture that edu­cates adults. ① The most com­mon method — adults imi­tate bet­ter edu­ca­tion­al meth­ods; ②
Adults them­selves ben­e­fit from it, it has noth­ing to do with edu­cat­ing chil­dren, it is part of self-edu­ca­tion.
   
At least because chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture can often show adults who are no longer chil­dren:
    ①
the free, nat­ur­al side of human beings;
    ②
The for­got­ten soul of art;
    ③
Philo­soph­i­cal Roots Search;
    ④
The dual­i­ty of growth—the oth­er side that is sup­pressed dur­ing the growth process;
    ⑤
the pos­si­bil­i­ty of “liv­ing hap­pi­ly ever after”;