Weibo Talk: Exams are really helpful for studying! ? @_@

Share #1New York Times # % Hot Arti­cles: Exams are real­ly help­ful for study­ingAccord­ing to a recent research report pub­lished in the Amer­i­can jour­nal Sci­ence, exams aren’t as bad as many peo­ple imag­ine. After a series of com­par­a­tive exper­i­ments, researchers found that com­pared to oth­er com­mon meth­ods (such as rep­e­ti­tion, draw­ing rela­tion­ship dia­grams, and high­light­ing key points), using exam review and retrieval meth­ods is the most effec­tive, with a 50% advan­tage!
 
围脖神侃:考试真的对学习很有帮助!?@_@

Com­par­ing the results of the four exper­i­men­tal groups, the exam­i­na­tion group is far ahead!

After read­ing it, I was ini­tial­ly a bit sur­prised, but after care­ful­ly read­ing the entire arti­cle and read­ing some of the read­ers’ com­ments, I grad­u­al­ly felt relieved. As the sur­vey report itself states: the group that admin­is­tered the exam was the least con­fi­dent about their future per­for­mance, yet ulti­mate­ly achieved the high­est scores. From a prac­ti­cal per­spec­tive, tar­get­ed exams are clear­ly the most effec­tive for achiev­ing bet­ter scores on future exams, often referred to as the “sea of ques­tions.”
 
#3 to be dis­cussed lat­er. A famous quote from the Bar Exam Rank­ings: The most impor­tant ques­tion in an exam is who sets the ques­tions. If we knew who set the ques­tions in advance, and could design review ques­tions based on the ques­tion­er’s think­ing, or sim­ply solve relat­ed ques­tions that the ques­tion­er had pre­vi­ous­ly set, then our exam scores would be much more effi­cient. There­fore, the ques­tion­able nature of this exper­i­men­tal result lies in the fact that the project design­er was the ques­tion­er both times!
 
#4 Third Com­ment. This exper­i­ment also lacked a con­trol group: a group com­plete­ly unaware of the upcom­ing exam, instead con­struct­ing knowl­edge from the learn­ing mate­ri­als in a play­ful and play­ful man­ner. All four groups were aware of the upcom­ing exam, which rais­es ques­tions about the con­clu­sion that “learn­ing is ben­e­fi­cial.” In fact, anoth­er study com­par­ing the two groups showed that stress-free, cre­ative, con­struc­tive learn­ing is sig­nif­i­cant­ly more effec­tive than exams.
 
#5 Four com­ments. The most pop­u­lar com­ment among over 300 com­ments stat­ed: “This study does­n’t mean that cur­rent US exams are help­ful for learn­ing!” It’s impor­tant to note that the exams in the exper­i­ment were close­ly relat­ed to the mate­r­i­al stu­dents were read­ing and were designed to help them under­stand the text. Actu­al exams, how­ev­er, are not like this. Agreed! Exams have long become a trap for strat­i­fy­ing peo­ple and lay­ing traps!